Trinity Sunday 2009

 

In the name of God, Creator, Christ and Holy Spirit. Amen.

 

Who is God? According to the catechism at the back of our prayer book, “God is one, yet revealed as Father, Son and Holy Spirit – a Holy Trinity.” It sounds so straight forward, doesn’t it? Written down in black and white it all looks incredibly simple, until you start to think about it, and even worse, try to explain it, and then it all becomes so very, very complex.

 

Today is one of those days in the Church calendar when a preacher needs to decide whether to preach the texts or preach the feast, and given the feast de jour there is a very definite temptation to go with the texts. Trinity Sunday is the only Feast of the Church dedicated to a doctrine, and some have suggested the reason for that is we did it once, saw the results and swore never to do it again. Bottom line, the Trinity is hard.

 

To which some will naturally respond, ‘no it’s not’. It’s certainly common enough. Throughout our services we’re surrounded by references to the Trinity and for many of us ‘Father, Son and Holy Spirit’ flows from our lips with no problem whatsoever, to which I respond, ‘so tell me what it means’. I am quite convinced that we need to stop at regular intervals and reflect on those things we say so often that we no longer think about what we’re saying – including the Trinity.

 

I was fortunate enough some years ago to be part of an interfaith dialogue session between Moslems and Christians in Auckland and the major issue the Moslems had with Christians was that we worship more than one God. We say we don’t, of course, and trot out explanations like the one in the catechism to prove it, but how much sense does that really make to an outsider – or an insider for that matter? God is three but God is one might be a cute theological construct that we take for granted, but for many it simply doesn’t stack up and I have to say that when I look at what people do apart from what they say, it doesn’t really stack up for many Christians either.

 

I listen to people’s prayers and I read the words of many song and hymns, and I’m quite sure that whether they realise it or not they’re actually praying to different Gods. We tell ourselves we’re not, but one of the things I’m trying to convince people about at the moment is that what we do actually shapes what we believe far more than what we say, and what we do really does point to the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit being three distinctly individual beings for many of us.

 

Why is that? Because the Trinity is hard. Because when it really comes down to it, we struggle to get our heads around the one God revealed as three persons thing really works. Because we don’t understand it.

 

So we come up with models and metaphors to try to help us and others understand the Trinity. Like water that can be solid, liquid and gas yet still water, well kind of, but it can’t be all three at the same time. Or a person who can be a Father and a Son and an Uncle or a Brother all at the same time, but they can’t be all to any one person, even in the strangest of towns. And the list goes on – somewhere down the line every attempt at explaining the Trinity via a metaphor or model falls down and in fact becomes heresy as far as orthodox Christian dogma is concerned.

 

So what are the alternatives? Should we abandon all hope of understanding the Trinity, and if so why on earth did we get stuck with it in the first place? To which I say, yes, and good question.

 

I need to note here that this is where my thoughts and the official doctrines of the Church part company somewhat, so if you’re planning on reporting me to the bishop start taking notes now.

 

How did we end up with the Trinity? Well, some will tell you its well founded in scripture, although you might note that neither the word nor even the concept appears in any of the readings we’ve heard this morning. You will certainly find in the Bible references to the Father, Son and Holy Spirit and even a couple where they are all mentioned at once, but nowhere will you find the word Trinity or a clear outline of the doctrine of the Trinity as we find it today.

 

What we do know is that over the first four centuries of the Church there was much argument and debate over the nature of Jesus and the relationship between him and God and the Holy Spirit and it was from that debate that the Trinity emerged triumphant. Even today though, right here in New Zealand, there are no fewer than four other official understandings within churches that would consider themselves at least Christian-related but don’t accept the orthodox doctrine of the Trinity, and I don’t really have a problem with that. I don’t have a problem because I believe quite firmly that the Trinity came out of the experiences of a group of people who were faced with different ideas and ideals, all seemingly coming from the one divine source, yet in some cases not just different but even contradictory, and somehow they needed a way to take all that and from it form an image of God that they could get their heads around. In other words, the Trinity is how they imagined God. My belief – and this is where I stand aside from the official position of the Church – is that the Trinity is a particular imagining of God, and that while the Trinity has a particular place of importance and significance within our faith, it is not the way of imagining God, but rather a way of imagining God.

 

Let me put it this way – if I asked you to sit down and write up some lists of what you know and believe about God you might come up with a long list including words like loving and healing and just and so on, or maybe different words entirely. What if I then asked you to spend some time reading and reflecting on what you had written, and then, having gone through all that, I ask you to close your eyes and imagine God, what would you see?

 

It’s quite possible that you might see something approaching the idea of the father, Son and Holy Spirit, but you might see something entirely different.

 

Of course those coming from a traditional understanding of the Trinity will dismiss this entirely. Their argument would be that the Trinity is divinely inspired and that within it we are instructed on how to understand God as God really is, while my idea just encourages you to make God look like whatever you want God to look like. But in my own defence I don’t want to encourage that at all. In fact, I’d suggest that if the God we imagine is exactly like the God we want, we’re probably imagining the wrong God.

 

My argument is that the image of the Trinity comes out of the experiences of God among those who developed it mingled with the understandings of God they found in their scriptures and tradition, just as ours should. Should we be confined to imagining God in just three ways? I don’t think so. My own experience has been that just when I think I’ve pin God down to this or that something comes along to un-pin God completely, so at the end of the day all of my images and imagining will be inadequate anyway, let alone just three.

 

This is where I think the Trinity is actually quite helpful – because it is so hard to understand and explain. In the Celtic tradition the Trinity is portrayed using three interconnected rings, or a knot, with each having its own space, but each also meeting in a single space, and its in that shared space where the mystery of God dwells. I find that helpful – at the heart of the Trinity is mystery and the reality that we will never fully understand or pin down God.

 

There is one other point about the Trinity that I think is important even while it presents so many problems to people of other faiths and opinions. Understanding God as not just one but three as well as one highlights one of my key experiences of God which I find echoed loudly through the Bible and the tradition of the Church – ultimately God can only be found in relationship. The Trinity is itself an expression of relationship which is borne out in the relationship between God and us and us and each other.

 

Which still isn’t to say that I’m willing to be restrained in my imagining of God. So perhaps I will just leave you with that invitation. Think about the God you have experienced and the God you have been taught about and the God you read about in the Bible – think about all the different things that the word God means to you – then close your eyes and imagine what that God might look like.

 

May the God who is ultimately beyond all our imaginings – the God who is both Father and Mother, Creator and Son, Nurturing Spirit and Strong Deliverer – the God of and for us all be at the heart of all we say and do. Amen.