St Luke’s, Havelock North – Easter 4 2007 ‘Good Shepherd Sunday’ - Sermon

 

“My sheep hear my voice. I know them and they follow me.”

 

In our Anglican tradition today is usually celebrated as Good Shepherd Sunday. Our gospel reading always comes from John 10 with its sheep – shepherd imagery, which in turn picks up at least a bit on last week’s theme when we had Jesus telling Peter to feed my sheep., and as you’ll remember I said last week if you were here, we need to be careful not to hear these stories as soft and lovely tales.

 

I’m not a rural person and I don’t come from a farming background, which is perhaps why to me most stories involving sheep seem to be about cute and cuddly lambs and lovely fluffy sheep, which is the opposite of the sort of focus we find in the sheep stories of scripture.

 

Sheep and shepherds are a big metaphor throughout the whole of the Bible. Look at David, the shepherd boy, chosen to be Israel’s king. Ezekiel – one of the maddest of the Old Testament prophets in my opinion – described the political leaders of his day as bad shepherds who neglected their sheep, while the shepherd messiah, on the other hand, would come and deal with all of them and the nasty sheep infecting the rest of the flock.

 

In the New Testament we find these metaphors also. In Revelation – as we’ve heard this morning – and elsewhere we get this description of ‘the Lamb of God’, an image rife with sacrificial meanings and not an ounce of cuteness. Jesus, of course, uses this imagery extensively, but again, it’s not about telling nice cuddly stories. When Jesus talks about sheep and shepherds he’s making hard points about difficult and often controversial issues, and when we think about what’s in all that for us we need to give some thought, I believe, to where we stand in the picture.

 

Last week we were told, ‘feed my sheep’. This week, though, we’re reminded that before we can feed others, we need to first be fed ourselves – before we can be shepherds, we have to be the sheep – and I think it’s often easier to be the shepherd than the sheep.

 

As I confessed last week, and I’ll gladly confess again, my experience of sheep is limited to say the best. I have, as I said, watched the odd episode of Country Calendar, I’ve certainly seen sheep frolicking in the hills – from a safe distance of course – I’ve eaten the occasional leg of lamb and now and then I wear wool. In fact my only up close and personal experience of sheep was on a retreat several years ago, staying in a shearers quarters, and it just happened to be at that time – I can’t remember what you call it – when the lambs are taken away from their mothers. So there I was, in the shearers quarters, with about a gazillion sheep right next door, and while I remember the awful noise, what I recall most of all was the shifty look in every sheep’s eyes.  From that day on I’ve been convinced they’re plotting something.

 

But it’s fair to say I don’t know much about sheep, and what I’ve heard about them isn’t that flattering. Sheep, I’ve heard, are stupid, lazy, completely lacking in initiative and creativity, and have a tendency to get lost or stuck in barbed wire or mud. Lambs are cute, but they grow up to be these thick, somewhat boring, and just a little scary, sheep.

 

So given all that, how do I feel about being described as one of them? I’m not sure it’s a description I like very much, and I suspect I’m not alone. How many of us really want to be called sheep? How often do you hear a parent urging their children to take on sheep-like qualities? We live in a culture that values everything that sheep don’t seem to stand for, so it seems unlikely that many of us will have as a primary goal to be a good sheep.

 

Sheep aren’t independent or self-made. Sheep need to be cared for and, quite often it seems, rescued from dire predicaments. The sheep-shepherd relationship, it seems to me, isn’t really one built on a sense of love and sentimentality. It’s based on practical and economic survival. The sheep can’t live without the shepherd and the shepherd won’t eat without the sheep.

 

So why would you bother knowing them by name?

 

Again, let’s be honest, all sheep look the same to me. Yes, I know there are black ones and white ones and small ones and big ones and some with horns and some without, but apart from those basic differences I couldn’t tell one sheep from the next. But I suspect many of you could. I suspect most sheep farmers can see a great deal of differences between sheep and Jesus takes that reality and uses it to represent how the Good Shepherd knows his sheep as individuals.

 

This is an important message, a vital message. It was vital to the small and struggling community that the writer of John’s gospel belonged to – a community facing struggles both internally and externally, a community that wasn’t sure where it fitted in the world and didn’t feel particularly loved or cared for by its wider society. It’s a message that remains vital today. Here, as Jesus talks about the sheep and the shepherds, he tries to get across some idea of God’s love for even the least, the most insignificant, of individuals. The rest of the flock ignores the scruffy runt that gets lost and into trouble, but the shepherd rejoices as he carries it home.

 

I think we find it easy to turn people into sheep. We find catch-all phrases to describe whole groups of people as ‘the poor’ or ‘the sick’ or ‘the lonely’. We talk about ethnic populations as if they were just one single mass of homogeneous humanity rather than starkly different individuals. I know I watch the television ads for World Vision and Child Fund and all the starving children look alike, as do their mothers and their villages. And somehow, having them all look the same makes it easier – easier to ignore their situation, easier not to feel their pain, easier to deny any similarities between them and me, easier to forget that I’m really a sheep as well.

 

“My sheep hear my voice. I know them.” There is, I believe, this almost constant tension within us – we desperately yearn to be known, but at the same time we fear it. That’s why sometimes, often, despite the challenges and the struggles and the costs, it’s actually easier to be the shepherd than the sheep. It’s easier to focus on feeding the hungry than it is to recognise and admit that we’re hungry too, that we need to be fed and comforted and acknowledged also. And we need to be known.

 

It’s very rare, if not unheard of, for us to really know or be known. Most of us most of the time only let people know as much of us as we want them to know, and we do the same when it comes to knowing others. In my position I get to hear perhaps a bit more than some people. I hear a number of secrets and confessions, but I know I’m not hearing the whole story. There’s no one I know completely, just as there’s no one who knows me completely, except the Good Shepherd.

 

It may be impossible to be fully known in our human relationships, but it forms the basis of our relationship with God. There are things I don’t want seen or known about me. To recognise and accept that I am known – completely known – is a potentially painful realisation. To accept that I am both fully known, and yet still completely loved is profoundly comforting.

 

In our society, which celebrates creativity and ingenuity and expects us to aim for greatness rather than settle for mediocrity, it can be hard to accept that we are sheep. Yet to let our defences drop, to put aside our striving for independence and to allow ourselves to be known and supported and carried upon the shepherd’s shoulders can be the most transformative experience of all. To experience the care and comfort and love of someone who knows us more intimately than anyone else ever can in turn makes us better at caring for and comforting and loving others. To experience life as a sheep makes us better people, but more importantly – most importantly – it brings us closer to the shepherd.

 

Thanks be to God.